Person A:
It just came to me: When reading the works of A.A.Milne while living a torahcentric life, one’s favorite character not only should not be but also cannot be… Piglet. Alas for those of us who admired his loyal nature and moments of superior intelligence when contrasted with the bumbling Pooh bear.
Quite possibly Charlotte’s Web should not be on the top of our reading list either. Isn’t it a wile of the Devil to ingratiate pigs into the homes of unknowing families through the interest of their children? Fie upon pigs, and may their true garbage-eating, slob-living, abominable habits be speedily recognized and abhorred.
Person B:
The way I see it is, A.A. Milne was writing about stuffed animals – not the real things. So we’re off the hook there, and besides, you really couldn’t be anyone but Piglet.
Charlotte’s Web is a different matter entirely. The moral of the story far outweighs the…um…means of telling it, I guess…
?

3 comments
Comments feed for this article
June 10, 2008 at 8:43 am
narnia95
Listen to me… Piglet (of course) has always been everyone’s favorite, and since he’s not real, I think it’s okay to like him. Its not saying that I like pigs… Piglet doesn’t even *look* like a pig… (does he?). When I look at a real pig, I hate it, and my stomach starts to churn. This is not the way with Piglet. In fact, Piglet deserves some love and care. Ok, that’s going a bit far I admit, but the subject deserves some thought. Does this mean we can’t have stuffed animals (beanie-babies) if they’re unclean animals??
June 16, 2008 at 11:51 am
Allyn
That is very funny. You have me thinking now because those are 2 of my favorite stories. Hummmmm…..
July 2, 2008 at 1:14 pm
smalltownprincess
Even though bunches of people had already seen it, I removed the names on the email messages mentioned above to protect the (lost) privacy of those involved. On our blog, anonymity and controvery are irrevocably tied together.*
(*Because we want everyone to love us.)