Pete invented the word stac a few years ago, and now he has an entire conceptual theory to go along with it:

I guess I will stac. No need not to stac. When stacing becomes tiresome, you have already left the realm of stacing, therefore you are not tired of stacing, but tired of the lack of stacing, in which case you must stac to quench your thirst, ergo stacing is perpetual and cannot be stopped, because the very essence of the thought of stopping would defy the very nature of stacing, thus leaving a void where stacing ought be, and since the nature of stacing is filling darkness with light, evil with good, wretchedness with unwretchedness, the void would be filled by stacing, which in turn would cause a void to be created, thus demanding the void to be filled again.

 

So why not STAC?

 Peter